"Towards a Technology for human progress it" This he current motto of the Federation of ISF and therefore ESF Galicia. Since the Federal Communications Commission hare poco llego a day email to the general list of ESF Galicia inviting a hacer lluvia ideas for new proposals for him motto
In these moments we Desarrollado he Communication Plan of the Federation English engineering Sin borders. As we have been discussing in annual meetings and communication meetings, one of the first things we need to update is our motto.
The current motto "For a technology for human development" stresses in the medium and not the purpose of the organization, it also strengthens the technical character and makes clear our names "ENGINEERING without frontiers "Ideally, the new slogan:
to proceed with the general population
Enter the objective of ISF and we position separating it from the technical view
Stream our work around the defense of human rights
Transmit the rights and processes related to the provision of basic services and resource management and territory have a special focus on our mission
As always, left us indifferent. Here are some early reviews that have appeared in the list following the mail. Do I need to change the slogan? Continue discussion in the blog!
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Participant 1
I would like to convey my contrary opinion to change the motto of the association this general list, as I did in the cosmic 2010 when interim results showed that "communication plan" in which I'm not sure as it has been involved from the ISF. Has voted
this change of slogan somewhere? What assembly? What xunta directive? Because if so I have not seen and I could not say (only in the cosmic). I only know of this issue because I commented on the cosmic is that some people outside the association (a consulting firm hired for the communication plan which certainly been done before making a strategic plan of the Federation, which for me is a big mistake) suggested a change of both logo and a slogan, it provides an overview of ESF too technical and engineering ... But the name we have, in my opinion, that alone is avoided by insisting activities and much that is everyone TpDH. And if we wanted to be a generalist NGOs would be otherwise, no ESF. No one works with the concept of putting technology at the service of human development and different concepts which are inherited TpDH and deepening of Technology soft-appropriate technologies-technologies with a human face (of which there was already talk in "small is beautiful" 1968, is an invention that was made from the motto adopted in 2003, as I think some people think, or at least gave that impression when I spoke of this in the cosmic). That theme
think it is "our difference" and what we bring in an NGO environment where I think the networking among various entities that have a certain specialization is the best way maintaining the diversity and richness of development associations ( and if not, how many people out there saying, why not instead of having so many tiny NGOs not get together all at once and so are more efficient? bufff ...).
The current motto of "putting technology to for human development "I think it affects something that we are providing a philosophical level (with conceptual and historical development of the concept of tpdh in various publications and course material) and see it as a key cross-cutting theme for the rest of the scene of cooperation (which also encompasses all that access to basic human rights of access to them). In fact, I think that slogan is also the ultimate goal , human development .
So I've blown away when I saw this as taking for granted the change, and I insist, I think starting the house from the roof to have a communication plan prior to a federal SCHEDULED. I would like our representatives in the federal assembly, or even our "infiltrators" in the board of the federation comment on something ...
do not know, cool like more ISF human dignity (as was mentioned in the plan cosmic joke ...) --------------------
-------------------------------------------------- Participant 2 ---------------------------
In these moments we Desarrollado he Communication Plan of the Federation English engineering Sin borders. As we have been discussing in annual meetings and communication meetings, one of the first things we need to update is our motto.
The current motto "For a technology for human development" stresses in the medium and not the purpose of the organization, it also strengthens the technical character and makes clear our names "ENGINEERING without frontiers "Ideally, the new slogan:
to proceed with the general population
Enter the objective of ISF and we position separating it from the technical view
Stream our work around the defense of human rights
Transmit the rights and processes related to the provision of basic services and resource management and territory have a special focus on our mission
As always, left us indifferent. Here are some early reviews that have appeared in the list following the mail. Do I need to change the slogan? Continue discussion in the blog!
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Participant 1
I would like to convey my contrary opinion to change the motto of the association this general list, as I did in the cosmic 2010 when interim results showed that "communication plan" in which I'm not sure as it has been involved from the ISF. Has voted
this change of slogan somewhere? What assembly? What xunta directive? Because if so I have not seen and I could not say (only in the cosmic). I only know of this issue because I commented on the cosmic is that some people outside the association (a consulting firm hired for the communication plan which certainly been done before making a strategic plan of the Federation, which for me is a big mistake) suggested a change of both logo and a slogan, it provides an overview of ESF too technical and engineering ... But the name we have, in my opinion, that alone is avoided by insisting activities and much that is everyone TpDH. And if we wanted to be a generalist NGOs would be otherwise, no ESF. No one works with the concept of putting technology at the service of human development and different concepts which are inherited TpDH and deepening of Technology soft-appropriate technologies-technologies with a human face (of which there was already talk in "small is beautiful" 1968, is an invention that was made from the motto adopted in 2003, as I think some people think, or at least gave that impression when I spoke of this in the cosmic). That theme
think it is "our difference" and what we bring in an NGO environment where I think the networking among various entities that have a certain specialization is the best way maintaining the diversity and richness of development associations ( and if not, how many people out there saying, why not instead of having so many tiny NGOs not get together all at once and so are more efficient? bufff ...).
The current motto of "putting technology to for human development "I think it affects something that we are providing a philosophical level (with conceptual and historical development of the concept of tpdh in various publications and course material) and see it as a key cross-cutting theme for the rest of the scene of cooperation (which also encompasses all that access to basic human rights of access to them). In fact, I think that slogan is also the ultimate goal , human development .
So I've blown away when I saw this as taking for granted the change, and I insist, I think starting the house from the roof to have a communication plan prior to a federal SCHEDULED. I would like our representatives in the federal assembly, or even our "infiltrators" in the board of the federation comment on something ...
do not know, cool like more ISF human dignity (as was mentioned in the plan cosmic joke ...) --------------------
-------------------------------------------------- Participant 2 ---------------------------
I agree with Participant 1 with some nuances. ESF is "Enxeñería" and therefore all (or at least consider estratétigicas lines) should revolve around it, regardless of personal capacity each may have interests and motivations to other fields. Do not know what was said this cosmic but in the previous and leave the issue informally and, unfortunately, throws into slogans were more general, it was said that the current motto does not correspond to reality ESF.
If the consultant said that the logo and name are too technical and engineering then, in my opinion, the name and logo are unbeatable.
The truth is that think that the reality of ESF to reflect this general trend. What I will say now I do not know if it is statistically correct, let's take what (I think) that we all agree, that is, actions in the North, among which EPD has the most impact. The question is, does the EPD of ESF activity is a general or engineering? I believe that general ... it is not something neither bad nor good, simply IS.
In short, one of the lines that we consider key strategic and engineering ESF is not, however, the motto we should all embrace each other.
Either we change the name, slogan or reorientation of activities.
The first has already been discussed in the penultimate Xuntanza of Coruña. The second is being considered now and the third is a bit what he says Participant 1 (more soft I) on the expertise of ESF activities and the necessary diversification is achieved by combining efforts from different associations, each a specialist in a field.
do you see, if this topic comes from a recurring again and again is something there ...
Ah! On the other hand, we are also in the recurring question of belonging to networks, "network brand identity ESF? In the survey responses on communication of Xuntanza de Compostela last year commented that it was a risk but could be avoided if ESF plays an active role and not get carried away. So, let us not llevar, but ... ¿What is your opinion about the ESF? It seems that the Participant and my first agree what should be ESF (in itself it sé PT tb agree;))
-------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
Participant 3
Without going deeply Discuss (do not have time) just want to point out some terms and make a series of questions ..
The engineering he is set conocimientos and scientific techniques applied to the invention, perfeccionamiento and use of techniques for solving problems that directly affect humans su in daily activity.
So just do engineering engineering??
Technology he is set conocimientos technical, scientifically arranged, allowing diseño and create good and services that facilitate adaptation to the environment and satisfy both the essential needs such as Deseos de las personas.
far as I know a psychologist / educator / journalist can do technical stuff, not? technical things will do things as opposed to general? that is to do technical things? consciousness is not something technical? entrontado is to make awareness and advocacy? it depends on the subject, no?
All these are issues of substance, but also shapes it, because if you decide to change the theme of ESF, and most of the social base and enter for a federal?? there was a debate? reflection? is something that will make yes or yes? something is happening .. something is being done wrong ...
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Participant 4
not completely agree with what he says Participant 2 of EPD, since initially FHS began to introduce this theme in teaching techniques (using its name, one can not deny, but we must take to get into places that other NGOs would not be in? this is networking to cover the whole of society!). The fact that it had been done systematically and with great quality, we made no reference at EPD technique (yes, for those unaware, ISF has started to introduce the teaching of values \u200b\u200band global citizenship in technical studies, not the general level, ie to make the future "technologists" have a vision of technology is not neutral and cool as before, but a point of view of appropriate technology and technology for human development). As in areas such as Galicia nobody did as much or as well as the United States, with a speech worked, and with presence in three Galician universities, because now we are one of the referees, not only in EPD for technical information, but the general level (for more than Standing in our courses in Santiago is called whenever the Education Without Borders to speak EPD). A proof is that the USC call us when we need to speak EPD generic courses or voluntary cooperation. But I insist, the "specialty" of ESF is to technical teachings EPD introducing the concept of EPD (the article is an example of Paul, where he speaks of realities and environments where the technology will be for e hai to be aware that dissolution or non é unha ferramenta nun became so, so development ferramenta eo desenvolvemento sexa or human).
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Participant 5
There a troll, with a point.
XD I want to propose that elevates Galician Federation
a change of name. I wish that instead of Enxeñería Sen Fronteiras call us
"or Desenvolvemento Tecnoloxía for Human"
This will solve other related problems out there.
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Participant 6
I think this whole issue very interesting of debate, and I would like to throw some opinions.
As stated by Participant 6, the federal communications plan is being worked on for several months. At the meeting held in A Coruña federal 14 months ago and propose a federal convention of communication, together with the Investigation Board and the group communication federal review all channels and develop proposals for a comprehensive communication plan. That plan was progressing and the participation of Galicia was very low. In my opinion, is an important issue, and also in Galicia there are people working on this issue, so I think we should have brought more.
Regarding the change theme, I think just is a proposal of ideas, and so must be understood. Very possibly erred federaml communication, because there is nothing approved or in assembly or federal board, and I assure you that the Federal Board is not currently on the agenda a change of logo or name, or slogan. We are open to all, obviously, but things do well, with proper steps in time.
Continuing the theme, because I think an interesting debate, and now as personal, to me if I would like to change. 10 years ago changed the slogan "a world more fair" to "tpdh" and I voted against it because I thought it reflected a restriction to two values \u200b\u200bthat are lame, "technology" and "human development". That slogan may justify ISF is dedicated to free software only, for instance, because it is a technology that is probably good for the development of mankind. ISF But I ask you something else, I ask involvement and a clear focus on the shift from doing things to ensure a better and fairer world for all. In the field of engineering, indeed, since this is the beta that we can exploit, but without the brace means to me "to technology for human development."
goodness and importance of TpDH is undeniable, but it must be one of our most powerful tools, not to define us to others and to ourselves. The slogan, a more ambitious and daring seems appropriate. That is why I like to open the debate about changing the slogan.
Cosmic remember in 2009, Saldana was debating this in a fairly massive workshop where we talked about the campaigns could be mounted at the federal level. In his many volunteers reflect on the old theme, the current and possible future, and there was a certain critical mass for change. This mass, combined with the findings of the communication plan, is what I think has brought this idea that, again, for now is reflexive and not proactive.
and thread a little above, a reflection, the Federation is moving in recent times. After years of lethargy seems certain (and insist on the "looks") that the ISF are betting on a stronger federation, with more work and common groups. This will cause the medium term to increase the number of federal proposals that ESF should vote and, if necessary, to comply. I know it sounds hard, but if the Federation is in this constructive line, we all need to:
- take more federal leadership to try all the strategies are consistent with ours.
- sometimes do our proposals "from outside", because we will be part of a whole.
This process I believe will be very positive and enriching for all. At least, I look forward to :-) -------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
---------- And you, what do you think?
-------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
Participant 3
Without going deeply Discuss (do not have time) just want to point out some terms and make a series of questions ..
The engineering he is set conocimientos and scientific techniques applied to the invention, perfeccionamiento and use of techniques for solving problems that directly affect humans su in daily activity.
So just do engineering engineering??
Technology he is set conocimientos technical, scientifically arranged, allowing diseño and create good and services that facilitate adaptation to the environment and satisfy both the essential needs such as Deseos de las personas.
far as I know a psychologist / educator / journalist can do technical stuff, not? technical things will do things as opposed to general? that is to do technical things? consciousness is not something technical? entrontado is to make awareness and advocacy? it depends on the subject, no?
All these are issues of substance, but also shapes it, because if you decide to change the theme of ESF, and most of the social base and enter for a federal?? there was a debate? reflection? is something that will make yes or yes? something is happening .. something is being done wrong ...
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Participant 4
not completely agree with what he says Participant 2 of EPD, since initially FHS began to introduce this theme in teaching techniques (using its name, one can not deny, but we must take to get into places that other NGOs would not be in? this is networking to cover the whole of society!). The fact that it had been done systematically and with great quality, we made no reference at EPD technique (yes, for those unaware, ISF has started to introduce the teaching of values \u200b\u200band global citizenship in technical studies, not the general level, ie to make the future "technologists" have a vision of technology is not neutral and cool as before, but a point of view of appropriate technology and technology for human development). As in areas such as Galicia nobody did as much or as well as the United States, with a speech worked, and with presence in three Galician universities, because now we are one of the referees, not only in EPD for technical information, but the general level (for more than Standing in our courses in Santiago is called whenever the Education Without Borders to speak EPD). A proof is that the USC call us when we need to speak EPD generic courses or voluntary cooperation. But I insist, the "specialty" of ESF is to technical teachings EPD introducing the concept of EPD (the article is an example of Paul, where he speaks of realities and environments where the technology will be for e hai to be aware that dissolution or non é unha ferramenta nun became so, so development ferramenta eo desenvolvemento sexa or human).
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Participant 5
There a troll, with a point.
XD I want to propose that elevates Galician Federation
a change of name. I wish that instead of Enxeñería Sen Fronteiras call us
"or Desenvolvemento Tecnoloxía for Human"
This will solve other related problems out there.
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- Participant 6
First I comment that surprised me too mail alluding to the slogan change ISF. As far as I know, has worked on a communications plan of the Federation (which, incidentally, has barely participated ESF Galicia) and proposed (not approved) things like changing theme. I could not confirm this, but I would say that the Federal Communications Plan is not even approved by the assembly. So do not think it will be a change of theme imminent, let alone non-consensual.
About the logo did not say anything because he has not talked about changing the image of ISF (at least for now). I think all opinions who are providing very interesting, and we go or not to change its slogan, the debate is open, so that what he is collecting them and try to reach a position or conclusion of ESF Galicia.
After reading emails from Participant 1 and Participant 2 did not look so clear that their views coincide. Participant 2 said that the ESF reality is that we are generalists, at least in the actions of EPD, which is something fundamental considermaos, and what we like to identify. So if that should change the slogan, or whatever it is that makes us seem too specific, no? I mean, to me it makes more sense to change a symbol that the content or the philosophy of the association.
And in regard to the process that was followed, and I say I'm the first surprise in the mail. However, there may have been a failure to communicate what happened in the comic or the federal communications commission (I think that nobody knew that one day he would get this message "warning of" a change of theme If we had obviously not commented). But what is certain is that the federal plan of communication was raised as a participatory process which, of course, and stûv guests. He ran a survey and made at least one meeting face to treat it. ESF Galicia only actively participated, I think because many people thought it was not the ideal way to develop a plan, with an external consultancy, without prior SCHEDULED, etc. .- but that does not mean that the process did not exist. Existed, and for the reasons we were not involved in it. I think if we did we would be more up to date with what's going on, so now to continue reviewing and to notify the rest of ISFs!
we then!
PD. Participant 5, know the signifcant to troll ... but ... I suppose it's for real ...
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Participant 7
About the logo did not say anything because he has not talked about changing the image of ISF (at least for now). I think all opinions who are providing very interesting, and we go or not to change its slogan, the debate is open, so that what he is collecting them and try to reach a position or conclusion of ESF Galicia.
After reading emails from Participant 1 and Participant 2 did not look so clear that their views coincide. Participant 2 said that the ESF reality is that we are generalists, at least in the actions of EPD, which is something fundamental considermaos, and what we like to identify. So if that should change the slogan, or whatever it is that makes us seem too specific, no? I mean, to me it makes more sense to change a symbol that the content or the philosophy of the association.
And in regard to the process that was followed, and I say I'm the first surprise in the mail. However, there may have been a failure to communicate what happened in the comic or the federal communications commission (I think that nobody knew that one day he would get this message "warning of" a change of theme If we had obviously not commented). But what is certain is that the federal plan of communication was raised as a participatory process which, of course, and stûv guests. He ran a survey and made at least one meeting face to treat it. ESF Galicia only actively participated, I think because many people thought it was not the ideal way to develop a plan, with an external consultancy, without prior SCHEDULED, etc. .- but that does not mean that the process did not exist. Existed, and for the reasons we were not involved in it. I think if we did we would be more up to date with what's going on, so now to continue reviewing and to notify the rest of ISFs!
we then!
PD. Participant 5, know the signifcant to troll ... but ... I suppose it's for real ...
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Participant 7
I think this whole issue very interesting of debate, and I would like to throw some opinions.
As stated by Participant 6, the federal communications plan is being worked on for several months. At the meeting held in A Coruña federal 14 months ago and propose a federal convention of communication, together with the Investigation Board and the group communication federal review all channels and develop proposals for a comprehensive communication plan. That plan was progressing and the participation of Galicia was very low. In my opinion, is an important issue, and also in Galicia there are people working on this issue, so I think we should have brought more.
Regarding the change theme, I think just is a proposal of ideas, and so must be understood. Very possibly erred federaml communication, because there is nothing approved or in assembly or federal board, and I assure you that the Federal Board is not currently on the agenda a change of logo or name, or slogan. We are open to all, obviously, but things do well, with proper steps in time.
Continuing the theme, because I think an interesting debate, and now as personal, to me if I would like to change. 10 years ago changed the slogan "a world more fair" to "tpdh" and I voted against it because I thought it reflected a restriction to two values \u200b\u200bthat are lame, "technology" and "human development". That slogan may justify ISF is dedicated to free software only, for instance, because it is a technology that is probably good for the development of mankind. ISF But I ask you something else, I ask involvement and a clear focus on the shift from doing things to ensure a better and fairer world for all. In the field of engineering, indeed, since this is the beta that we can exploit, but without the brace means to me "to technology for human development."
goodness and importance of TpDH is undeniable, but it must be one of our most powerful tools, not to define us to others and to ourselves. The slogan, a more ambitious and daring seems appropriate. That is why I like to open the debate about changing the slogan.
Cosmic remember in 2009, Saldana was debating this in a fairly massive workshop where we talked about the campaigns could be mounted at the federal level. In his many volunteers reflect on the old theme, the current and possible future, and there was a certain critical mass for change. This mass, combined with the findings of the communication plan, is what I think has brought this idea that, again, for now is reflexive and not proactive.
and thread a little above, a reflection, the Federation is moving in recent times. After years of lethargy seems certain (and insist on the "looks") that the ISF are betting on a stronger federation, with more work and common groups. This will cause the medium term to increase the number of federal proposals that ESF should vote and, if necessary, to comply. I know it sounds hard, but if the Federation is in this constructive line, we all need to:
- take more federal leadership to try all the strategies are consistent with ours.
- sometimes do our proposals "from outside", because we will be part of a whole.
This process I believe will be very positive and enriching for all. At least, I look forward to :-) -------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
---------- And you, what do you think?
0 comments:
Post a Comment